Danica Maier and I will be presenting a paper at The
Crisis Collective! the forthcoming SAR International Conference on
Artistic Research 2020 held on 25–28 March 2020 in Bergen, Norway. The
Crisis Collective! investigates and discusses the relation between
Artistic Research, various notions of collective reality and alternative
imaginations. Can Artistic Research - through artistic actions - generate
alternative modes of knowledge, art, and reality? Our
proposed presentation will contribute to the thematic strand within the
conference entitled Hammer and Mirror? The language of artistic
research. Artistic research shares its metaphorical language with the
language of capitalism, sports, and warfare. Resource. Production. Method.
Gain. Challenge. Opposition. Defence. This vocabulary creates a formal context
and an imminent agency that might influence the specific Artistic Research
undertakings and their potential to intervene into the larger collectives of
reflection and discourse.
Abstract: No Telos - Tactics of
Affirmative Uncertainty
How can artistic research operate
alternatively to the language of capitalism, sports and warfare (modelled on
economic efficiency/gain, competition/success, target-hitting/strategic
machination)? How can artistic research practices that are non-teleological,
atelic or autotelic intervene in and unsettle the outcome-motivated and
achievement-driven tendencies of contemporary culture, by cultivating shared
practices of experiential becoming and collective being-doing? Reflecting
on No Telos (2016>) — a project exploring the critical
role of uncertainty, disorientation and not knowing within artistic
research-practice — we ask: How can we shift emphasis from goal-oriented
productivity towards experimental forms of process-led exploration, subversive
playfulness and wilful irresolution? Can we differentiate affirming and
debilitating forms of uncertainty and open-endedness, between a not knowing
that vectors towards generative exploration and that which paralyses, creates
stasis? What role has the practising of creative uncertainty within the
uncertain conditions of contemporary life? Towards an ethics of uncertainty —
how can an encounter with the unfamiliar and strange(r) operate as a
micro-political, ethico-aesthetic practice? The rhetoric of art practice,
pedagogy and research often foregrounds not knowing, uncertainty and getting
lost — yet how can such principles be taught or practised? Against
the strategic power dynamics of institutionalised research, No Telos embraces
Michel de Certeau’s advocacy of everyday ‘tactics’ that invigorate the
experiential quality of life lived — aesthetic practices of reading, looking,
walking, talking, eating, being-with. Invoking the Latin etymology of ‘mirror’
— mirare: to observe, contemplate, look at, wonder — we ask: How
can artistic research not only mirror back (reflect, reveal) the conditions of
life as-is, but also reactivate critical curiosity (Paulo Freire), re-engage a
capacity for collective attention and imagination?