Emma Cocker is a writer-artist based in Sheffield and Associate Professor in Fine Art at Nottingham Trent University. Operating under the title Not Yet There, Cocker's research focuses on the process of artistic exploration and the performing of ‘thinking-in-action’ emerging therein; on models of (art) practice and subjectivity that resist the pressure of a single, stable position by remaining wilfully unresolved. Her mode of working unfolds restlessly along the threshold between writing/art, including experimental, performative and collaborative approaches to producing texts parallel to and as art practice. Cocker's recent writing has been published in Failure, 2010; Stillness in a Mobile World, 2010; Drawing a Hypothesis: Figures of Thought, 2011; Hyperdrawing: Beyond the Lines of Contemporary Art, 2012; Reading/Feeling (Affect), 2013; On Not Knowing: How Artists Think, 2013; Choreo-graphic Figures: Deviations from the Line, 2017; The Creative Critic: Writing as/about Practice, and as a solo collection entitled The Yes of the No, 2016.

New work: Close Reading (Feeling it for You)


Tests from a series of new ‘Close Readings’ generated from my experience as ‘Seer-in-Residence’ (see posts below). The texts encountered during my residency included: Roland Barthes, ‘The Metaphor of the Eye’, from Georges Bataille, The Story of Eye; Catherine Clémente, ‘Syncope’s Strategies, from Syncope: The Philosophy of Rapture; Hélène Cixous, ‘Writing Blind’, from Stigmata: Escaping Texts; Luce Irigaray, ‘To perceive the invisible in you’, from To Be Two. The second 'close reading' draws on a sentence from Cixous' Writing Blind, "Answer: the text needs the paper. It is in the contact with the sheet of paper that sentences emerge", which seems especially pertinent to the concerns of my Close Readings.
 
Emma Cocker, Close Reading, (L.I.T.B.T)

Emma Cocker, Close Reading, (H.C.W.B)

Event: Close Reading/Live Writing (fragments)


Further documentation from my Close Reading/Live Writing, undertaken as a ‘Seer-in-Residence’at Bonington Gallery, Nottingham in conjunction with the exhibition From Where I Stand I Can See You by Traci Kelly and Rita Marhaug.  Photography by Julian Hughes.

Event: Close Reading / Live Writing


Emma Cocker, Close Reading/Live Writing, undertaken as a ‘Seer-in-Residence’.

On Thursday 10 January I undertook a ‘micro-residency’ as a ‘Seer-in-Residence’ at Bonington Gallery, Nottingham in conjunction with the exhibition From Where I Stand I Can See You by Traci Kelly and Rita Marhaug. Along with 3 other researchers (including Jo Lee and Ben Judd who will be "seers" in the coming weeks), I was invited by Traci Kelly to spend time interacting with the exhibition in a way that evokes my own practice and research interests. 

Emma Cocker, Close Reading/Live Writing, undertaken as a ‘Seer-in-Residence’.

I approached the ‘residency’ through the prism of my ongoing Close Readings project. Amongst other things, I performed a ‘close reading’ of Kelly’s work Feeling It For You (Perspective), alongside fragments from a number of texts that seemed to resonate with some of the concerns of the exhibition (listed below), applying close visual attention to both text and image using a microscopic camera (as a live/performative action which will subsequently result in video/text-based work). The texts included: Roland Barthes, ‘The Metaphor of the Eye’, from Georges Bataille, The Story of Eye; Catherine Clémente, ‘Syncope’s Strategies, from Syncope: The Philosophy of Rapture; Hélène Cixous, ‘Writing Blind’, from Stigmata: Escaping Texts; Luce Irigaray, ‘To perceive the invisible in you’, from To Be Two.

Emma Cocker, Close Reading/Live Writing, undertaken as a ‘Seer-in-Residence’.

Whilst the Close Reading series is ongoing, this was a first attempt at staging the process as a live event, which I hope to now develop further within other contexts. The 'Seer-in-Residence' invitation has also enabled me to develop a form of Live Writing (even Live Notation perhaps?) in which live reflections are compiled (see the left-hand screen) and then animated through the repeated scrolling and skimming of the text. Extending from the 'Seer-in-Residence' experience, I hope to develop a video or possible text-work from the Live Writing component, alongside new writing exploring ideas around eclipses, ellipses and ellipsis, and the relationship between ‘seeing’ and ‘reading’. The event was also documented by Julian Hughes, whose photographs will help to reflect the various methods/processes explored during the Seers-in-Residence project within a forthcoming publication.




Writing: Stepping Towards Stepping Away


Below is my introductory text produced as part of the 'Seer-in-Residence' project linked to the collaborative exhibition, From Where I Stand I can See You by Traci Kelly and Rita Marhaug, opening this week at Bonington Gallery, Nottingham. Along with 3 colleagues, I have been invited to be a 'Seer-in-Residence', interacting specifically with Kelly's work Feeling it For You (Perspective) through the prism of my own practice and research interests. The results of the 'Seer-in-Residence' project will be published later in 2013.

Stepping Towards Stepping Away

(W)e can each become, the one for the other, a bridge towards a becoming which is yours, mine, and ours. I can be a bridge for you, as you can be one for me. This bridge can never become the property of either … I perceive you, I create an idea for you, I preserve you in my memory in affect, in thought in order to assist your becoming. While I become me, I remember you. This should be a double gesture: you should be a bridge for me, as I should be one for you. Without a doubt, these bridges are not the same. [1]

Within a research culture that often privileges the distinction of one’s research from others, what place is there for the building of bridges? Beyond the realm of institutional collaboration and network bids, what does it really mean to construct spaces for speculation, for sharing ideas, for thinking together? How might I become a bridge for you, as you can be one for me? The construction of bridges attests to the desire for connection, facilitating movement and communication between one place or person and another. A bridge is used to join territories, opening opportunities for further dialogue and exchange. Building bridges can overcome obstacles that might otherwise divide and isolate, by creating passageway over rivers and chasms, or by crossing the line of difference that separates here from there, then from now, you from me, the familiar from the as-yet-unknown. A bridge might begin with an invitation, an initial reaching towards the other. Towards reciprocity I approach you through the prism of my own practice; in turn, my practice is approached through the prism of yours. Yet, there are inherent risks to bridge building proposals can collapse before they ever get off the ground; rejection too, for there will always be those who prefer to remain an island. The bridge contains both threat and promise, for it involves a challenge to one’s habitual limits, it requires one’s borders are rendered open, porous. A bridge must be built in good faith neither in fear of trespass or invasion from the other, nor based on a will to territorialize and control. The bridge is the space where true collaborations are founded, never fully owned by either side. Not just for crossing or passage, the bridge itself can be inhabited as a working zone, a state of temporary suspension that refuses to be bound by the binary logic of either ‘this’ or ‘that’. Franchissement a French term meaning both crossing and clearing. Bridge always both and between, always inter. The bridge is akin to the space of artistic research: between production and reflection, between art world and academia, between […] Between ignorance and knowledge, Sarat Maharaj locates the Sanskrit term avidya or ‘non-knowledge’. Avidya is not the opposite of vidya (knowledge or ‘to see-know’) but rather the prefix a signals towards neutrality, the suspension of binary terms. [2] For Maharaj, ‘Avidya is more about production, about generating new forms of think-feel-know, about first-person creativity, unknown circuits of consciousness … an unscripted condition where anything might happen’.[3] To step onto a bridge is to abandon something of the terra firma of solid ground, as a step towards the other is a step away from oneself, one’s comfort zone. A bridge can lead first in the direction of open water before it reaches the far shore. Dépaysement a French term meaning to be taken out of one’s element, led astray. [4] A vertiginous pleasure can be experienced in stepping off, into the brink, away from what is known or certain. A bridge is not always constructed for the purposes of getting to the other side. There are certain perspectives that can be encountered only by inhabiting the points between, by relinquishing fixed positions, through loss of stable ground.




[1] Luce Irigaray, ‘To perceive the invisible in you’, in To Be Two, (The Athlone Press: London and New Brunswick, 2000), p.43.
[2]  Maharaj gives examples of the neutral prefix a including ‘typical - atypical - untypical’ and ‘moral - amoral - immoral’. See Maharaj, in Sarat Maharaj and Francisco Varela, ‘Ahamkara: Particules élémentaires of first-person consciousness’, in Intellectual Birdhouse: Artistic Practice as Research, (Koenig Books, 2012), p.73.
[3] Maharaj, 2012, p.73.
[4] Alternatively, Michel Foucault uses the term égarement to mean ‘straying afield from oneself’, as noted by Paul Rabinow in Michel Foucault, Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954 — 1984, Vol. 1 Subjectivity and Truth, (ed.) (The New Press, 1997), p.xxxix.


Publication - Reading/Feeling




The publication Reading/Feeling to which I have contributed an introductory essay (entitled Reading Towards Becoming Causal) will be launched at the Goethe Institute in Amsterdam on 
20 January 2013.


READER

Reading/Feeling


Reading/Feeling centres around the notion of affect, a term that delineates a field where the personal and the political meet through sensory movements between bodies. Affect, as a pre-emotional experience, constitutes the social and economic relationships that make up the fabric of society. Reading/Feeling considers the meaning of affect in theory and artistic practice, with a selection of texts by theoreticians, artists and curators that were read in If I Can’t Dance, I Don’t Want to be Part of Your Revolution’s reading groups in Amsterdam, Sheffield and Toronto for the past two years, as part of the programme Edition IV – Affect (2010 -2012).

Reading/Feeling includes text by: Sara Ahmed, Rhea Anastas, Lauren Berlant, Leo Bersani, Lone Bertelsen, Gregg Bordowitz, Judith Butler, Jeremiah Day, Gilles Deleuze, Lucien Febvre, Simone Forti, Adam Frank, Andrea Fraser, Félix Guattari, Sharon Hayes, Michael Hardt, Brian Holmes, Jutta Koether, Glenn Ligon, Biran Massumi, Helen Molesworth, Andrew Murphie, Sina Najafi, George Orwell, Emily Roysdon, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, David Serlin, Baruch Spinoza, Susan Sontag, Jan Verwoert, Mary Zouranzi, plus newly commissioned essays from Tanja Baudoin, Emma Cocker, and Jacob Korczynski, contributions by reading group members and artist pages by Matthew Lutz-Kinoy.

Edited by Tanja Baudoin, Frédérique Bergholtz and Vivien Ziherl. ISBN 978-90-814471-0-2

Price 20 Euro. Order via info@ificantdance.org

Background to the publication and future development
From Affect to Appropriation
Over the past two years the notion of affect formed a shared interest that bound together If I Can’t Dance’s programme of New Commissions and Performance in Residence projects. In reading groups and workshops IICD studied theories of affect as a pre-emotional state that is formative to our relationships with others as it moves between bodies and gives shape to subjectivities. This impetus has since extended into readings that move via theories of affect to an understanding of appropriation as an act of dedication. In the next two years, IICD will explore the productive friction between the notion of ‘making something your own’ as a potential subversive strategy and the inverse availability to be transformed by the objects we would attempt to possess. IICD will depart from discussions of appropriation as they first arose around artistic practices in the 1980s as part of a discourse that questioned the modernist hegemony of originality and autonomy in art. These were firmly rooted in a Marxist critique of appropriation in resistance to capitalist dispossession. IICD strive to interrogate the connections between that moment in the 1980s and today, and to think about appropriation in relation to current artistic practice, more specifically performance practice.